coin-img-ESPESP+155.87%coin-img-ETHETH-0.95%coin-img-BTCBTC-1.29%coin-img-SOLSOL-2.07%coin-img-XRPXRP-0.24%coin-img-USDCUSDC+0.01%coin-img-XAUTXAUT-2.27%coin-img-POKEEPOKEE-75.48%coin-img-ESPESP+155.87%coin-img-ETHETH-0.95%coin-img-BTCBTC-1.29%coin-img-SOLSOL-2.07%coin-img-XRPXRP-0.24%coin-img-USDCUSDC+0.01%coin-img-XAUTXAUT-2.27%coin-img-POKEEPOKEE-75.48%coin-img-ESPESP+155.87%coin-img-ETHETH-0.95%coin-img-BTCBTC-1.29%coin-img-SOLSOL-2.07%coin-img-XRPXRP-0.24%coin-img-USDCUSDC+0.01%coin-img-XAUTXAUT-2.27%coin-img-POKEEPOKEE-75.48%coin-img-ESPESP+155.87%coin-img-ETHETH-0.95%coin-img-BTCBTC-1.29%coin-img-SOLSOL-2.07%coin-img-XRPXRP-0.24%coin-img-USDCUSDC+0.01%coin-img-XAUTXAUT-2.27%coin-img-POKEEPOKEE-75.48%
user-avatar
Ana Zirojević

Ethereum user pays 64.09 ETH ($125,000) fee for near-zero transfer on February 11

On February 11, Lookonchain and Whale Alert flagged an Ethereum transaction that attached a 64.09 ETH fee, roughly $125,000, to a single transfer. The transaction moved just 0.000000000024433988 ETH, with blockchain records indicating an unusually high gas configuration.
ETH
ETH-0.45%
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion and does not represent BingX’s stance. It shall not be construed as investment advice from BingX. For details, refer to the Terms and Conditions.
Ethereum